<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Advocate Daily &#187; Barrie real estate lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://advocatedaily.com/tag/barrie-real-estate-lawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://advocatedaily.com</link>
	<description>Ontario&#039;s Legal News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:48:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>B.C. landlord-tenant case highlights need for legislation review</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2013/03/b-c-landlord-tenant-case-highlights-need-for-legislation-review/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2013/03/b-c-landlord-tenant-case-highlights-need-for-legislation-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Helen Burnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdvocateDaily.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer Shari Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlord and tenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord and Tenant Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=18342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent case in British Columbia involving a tenant who never paid rent and allegedly worked the system to delay eviction is another example of why landlord-tenant legislation needs to be reviewed and amended, explains Barrie real estate lawyer Shari Elliott. The case involves a family evicted six times in Victoria, B.C. since 2010 for failing [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2013/03/b-c-landlord-tenant-case-highlights-need-for-legislation-review/">B.C. landlord-tenant case highlights need for legislation review</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2013/03/b-c-landlord-tenant-case-highlights-need-for-legislation-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does irrevocable mean irrevocable?</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2013/02/does-irrevocable-mean-irrevocable/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2013/02/does-irrevocable-mean-irrevocable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Helen Burnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer Shari Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=18118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Shari Elliott I have been asked on more than one occasion by real estate agents if they can withdraw an offer after it has been submitted and prior to the irrevocable date and time. I think the misunderstanding around this comes from the fact that in regular contract negotiations, after an offer is submitted [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2013/02/does-irrevocable-mean-irrevocable/">Does irrevocable mean irrevocable?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2013/02/does-irrevocable-mean-irrevocable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landlords must protect their property</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/11/landlords-must-protect-their-property/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/11/landlords-must-protect-their-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdvocateDaily Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer Shari Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D'Amico v. Hitti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord and Tenant Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=14273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The priority for landlords in disputes with their tenants is to protect their property, Barrie real estate lawyer Shari Elliott tells Law Times.  Read Law Times   “What landlords have resorted to is (to) provide a cash incentive for the tenant to leave to assist them with securing a new place to live with a different landlord,” [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2012/11/landlords-must-protect-their-property/">Landlords must protect their property</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/11/landlords-must-protect-their-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if the property you&#8217;re purchasing has a tenant?</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/09/what-if-the-property-youre-purchasing-has-a-tenant/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/09/what-if-the-property-youre-purchasing-has-a-tenant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdvocateDaily Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliott & Elliott LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliott Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=12223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Shari Elliott In a file that I recently encountered I made a suggestion for an amendment to the agreement of purchase and sale due to the fact that there was a tenant at the property in question.   If you are making an offer on a property that has a tenant, even if you [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2012/09/what-if-the-property-youre-purchasing-has-a-tenant/">What if the property you&#8217;re purchasing has a tenant?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/09/what-if-the-property-youre-purchasing-has-a-tenant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds force Canadians to lower debt via regulatory changes – again</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/06/feds-force-canadians-to-lower-debt-via-regulatory-changes-again/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/06/feds-force-canadians-to-lower-debt-via-regulatory-changes-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdvocateDaily Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliott & Elliott LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=9843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Shari Elliott and Hayley Valleau On July 9 the mortgage lending rules will be tightened once again in order to gain control of the rising household debt levels in Canada, which marks the third time in five years that the federal government has made changes. The first change was in 2008, when the maximum amortization [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2012/06/feds-force-canadians-to-lower-debt-via-regulatory-changes-again/">Feds force Canadians to lower debt via regulatory changes – again</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/06/feds-force-canadians-to-lower-debt-via-regulatory-changes-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the sale of vacant land subject to HST?</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/05/is-the-sale-of-vacant-land-subject-to-hst/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/05/is-the-sale-of-vacant-land-subject-to-hst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 07:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdvocateDaily Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie environment lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliott & Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=8742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Shari Elliott  The answer is probably not &#8230; but, maybe. The situations when the sale will be tax exempt include: if the vendor is an individual and the land was kept by that person for personal use; if the parcel is being created by subdividing another parcel and the vendor is an individual and [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2012/05/is-the-sale-of-vacant-land-subject-to-hst/">Is the sale of vacant land subject to HST?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/05/is-the-sale-of-vacant-land-subject-to-hst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listing a former grow op?</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/listing-a-former-grow-op/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/listing-a-former-grow-op/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdvocateDaily Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliott & Elliott LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grow-op]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=7976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Shari Elliott What are Your Disclosure Obligations? The disclosure obligations of real estate agents in Ontario are unclear for what are commonly referred to as stigmatized properties. But disclosure is clearly required for one category of stigmatized properties that being homes that were used in a grow-op operation.  The RECO website has a notice [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/listing-a-former-grow-op/">Listing a former grow op?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/listing-a-former-grow-op/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seller information forms: buyer beware</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/seller-information-forms-buyer-beware/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/seller-information-forms-buyer-beware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdvocateDaily Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caveat emptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliott & Elliott LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller information forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=7536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barrie real estate lawyer Shari Elliott tells Law Times the main legal issue in a case involving the use of seller information forms is the principle of caveat emptor. Elliott notes the case involves common law defences. The buyers are saying they should have been told, while the sellers are saying they had no obligation [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/seller-information-forms-buyer-beware/">Seller information forms: buyer beware</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/seller-information-forms-buyer-beware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nortel walks from $18 million clean-up cost</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/nortel-walks-from-18-million-clean-up-cost/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/nortel-walks-from-18-million-clean-up-cost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdvocateDaily Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie environment lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies' creditors arrangement act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliott & Elliott LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nortel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Superior Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=7490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Shari Elliott It is no surprise that Nortel is insolvent and seeking to restructure under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). What is a surprise is the ruling this month of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice that the Ministry of Environment orders, which require Nortel to perform environmental clean-up work, do not take [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/nortel-walks-from-18-million-clean-up-cost/">Nortel walks from $18 million clean-up cost</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/04/nortel-walks-from-18-million-clean-up-cost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When is a used residential property subject to HST?</title>
		<link>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/03/when-is-a-used-residential-property-subject-to-hst/</link>
		<comments>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/03/when-is-a-used-residential-property-subject-to-hst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdvocateDaily Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Areas of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrie real estate lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliott & Elliott Barristers and Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shari Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advocatedaily.com/?p=6643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Shari Elliott It is important to turn your mind to whether a used residential property is subject to HST if that property is larger than a half hectare. Revenue Canada’s definition of a principal residence includes a limit on the land size to a half hectare. This is the amount of land that is [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://advocatedaily.com/2012/03/when-is-a-used-residential-property-subject-to-hst/">When is a used residential property subject to HST?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://advocatedaily.com">Advocate Daily</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://advocatedaily.com/2012/03/when-is-a-used-residential-property-subject-to-hst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
